![]() The only relevant piece of information that I could find as to what PSINet do these days is this one: ![]() There's not much to be found by PSINet or Cogent who own them, but they don't seem to offer hosting services. Their IP addresses belong to a company named PSI net:Ĭomment: Reassignment information for this block can be found at There is opportunity in specific vertical markets to sell a solution (object paired with compute) but a pure S3 endpoint will never take substantial marketshare away from AWS. Wasabi is an economy at scale play that cast way too far a net. AWS is very open about this in white papers, conferences, tech talks, etc. The only place Wasabi becomes cheaper is for those using S3 direct/alone which is a very small subset of S3 usage. ![]() That being said, Wasabi becomes a more expensive option as you have a 4 cent egress fee to access data from the rest of your AWS infrastructure. I would want to see a white paper breaking this down. Their durability claims are highly suspect. ![]() To their credit - PUT, GET and DELETE did work but that is only 3 of 100’s of API’s. I didn’t dig into this too far but they do claim “No need to change your S3-compatible application” so changing my endpoint + credentials should have worked. They claim 100% S3 compatibility but it fails a large number of API calls using Ceph’s s3-test. Amazon S3 has far better write performance than their claims. Their performance claims are incredibly biased. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |